Legal Certainty Against the Annulment of Ultra Petita Divorce Decisions (Case Study of Decision Number 132/Pdt. G/2019/PN Bpp Jo Decision Number 125/Pdt/2019/PT.SMR)
Kepastian Hukum terhadap Pembatalan Putusan Perceraian yang Bersifat Ultra Petita (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 132/Pdt. G/2019/PN Bpp Jo Putusan Nomor 125/Pdt/2019/PT.SMR)
الكلمات المفتاحية:
legal certainty، divorce، ultra petitaالملخص
Article 24 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in conjunction with Article 1 paragraph 1 of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power regulates the authority of court judges who have the freedom to make decisions to the extent regulated by law. However, civil court judges are prohibited from committing ultra petita which can result in the annulment of the decision at the appeal level as happened in Decision Number 125/Pdt/2019/PT.SMR. The problem in this study is how are the criteria for ultra petita court decisions? How are the decisions and legal considerations of the judges of the East Kalimantan High Court Decision Number 125/Pdt/2019/PT.SMR which annulled the Balikpapan District Court Decision Number 132/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Bpp on divorce considered as ultra petita? This research method is normative juridical using secondary data. The results of the research state that the criteria for ultra petita court decisions are first the judge's decision that exceeds the petitum; Second is that the Court Judge who grants part of the prima facie petitum and part of the subsidiary petitum; Third is that the Court Judge is active. The decision and legal reasoning of the Judge of the East Kalimantan High Court Number 125/Pdt/2019/PT.SMR which annulled the decision of the Balikpapan District Court Number 132/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Bpp on divorce is considered as ultra petita is not appropriate. This is because the Judge of Balikpapan District Court gave a clear and detailed reason in his consideration, namely in the context of orderly administration. Other than that, there is a request for ex aequo et bono from the plaintiff. Another thing is the freedom of judges in deciding cases as mandated by the Constitution.
المراجع
Apeldoorn, L.J. van., Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramitha, 2009.
Diantha, I Made Pasek, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum, Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2016.
Harahap, M. Yahya, Beberapa Permasalahan Peradilan dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Bandung: Pustaka Rosdakarya, 1997.
Harahap, M. Yahya, Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan, Jakarta: Dinar Grafika, 2008.
Hidayat, Maskur, “Hukum Perdata Progresif: Perubahan dan Kesinambungan Penemuan Hukum Di Bidang Hukum Perdata” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Vol. 3, Nomor 3 Nopember 2014.
Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Indonesia, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 9 Tahun 1975 tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia.
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1974 Nomor 1, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3019).
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2019 Nomor 186, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6401).
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 tentang Administrasi Kependudukan (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2006 Nomor 124, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4674).
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 157, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5076).
Junaidi & M. Martindo Merta, “Asas Hakim Pasif Dalam Reglement Op De Rechtsvordering (R.V) Dan Prinsip Hakim Aktif Dalam Herziene Indonesisch Reglement (HIR) Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan”, Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum QISTIE Vol. 13 No. 1 Mei 2020.
Ranuhandoko, I.P.M., Terminologi Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Garfika, 2000.
Sudarsono, Hukum Perkawinan Nasional, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.
التنزيلات
منشور
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2024 Al-Zaujiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
